For well over a century, the forests of Virginia
have been subjected to high-grade logging, fire suppression, road
building, grazing, mining, and invasion by non-native species of
plants and animals. These activities have eroded or compacted
soil, deposited large amounts of sediment in streams, fragmented
wildlife habitats, removed or reduced the abundance of healthy
seed trees of desirable lumber species, facilitated the spread of
invasive tree diseases and pests, and caused the loss of native
flora and fauna. Most of Virginias remaining woodlands are
now in a degraded condition and overstocked with low value trees.
For these reasons, VAFW supports the development and
implementation of Restoration Forestry on public lands. The
primary goal of Restoration Forestry is restoring natural
processes and resilience to forests through methods that mimic
natural cycles, historic forest composition and structure, and
disturbance regimes. Extraction of forest products is a
by-product of restoration, not the goal. A multitude of forest
values are conserved by restoration practices including old
growth, carbon storage, clean water supply, forest-interior
wildlife habitat, and recreational potential.
The principles of Restoration Forestry were defined by scientists
and forest advocates in: DellaSala, D. A., A. Martin, R. Spivak,
T. Schulke, B. Bird, M. Criley, C. van Daalen, J. Kreilick, R.
Brown, and G. Aplet. 2003. A Citizen's Call for Ecological Forest
Restoration: Forest Restoration: Principles and Criteria.
Ecological Restoration 21(1):14-23. http://www.virginiaforestwatch.org/docs/RestorationPrinciples.pdf
In some cases, a reference historic forest (before large-scale
anthropogenic disruption by logging, mining, etc.) may be
sufficiently documented to serve as a model for restoring the
current forest. Where historic forests are not well documented,
methods that foster native biodiversity on local and regional
scales and allow natural disturbance regimes to dominate
succession may be appropriate. In general, Virginias
hardwood forests were historically uneven-aged with disturbance
regimes based on patchy wind throws, insect infestations, and
occasional small-scale, low intensity fires.
Restoration forestry uses three approaches. First is protection
of areas of high ecological integrity, such as intact natural
areas, tracts of old-growth forests, large roadless areas,
Wilderness areas, and unimpaired streams. Second is passive
restoration, such as the reduction or cessation of destructive
logging, road-building, livestock grazing, mining, building of
dams and water diversions, off-road vehicle use, and alteration
of fire regimes. Third is active restoration, including
prescribed burning, timber stand improvements such as thinning
and pruning, road obliteration, removal of barriers to fish
passage and water diversions, removal or control of invasive
species, fuel treatment, and planting of riparian buffer strips.
Restoration project planning should be based on an assessment
that identifies ecological problems, defines appropriate
restoration methods based on scientific data, incorporates local
knowledge and utilizes local labor, makes use of a process that
facilitates transparency and communications with local
communities, designs treatments that are the least intrusive
options available, avoids negative cumulative effects on
watersheds and wildlife, and complies with all local, state and
federal laws and regulations. The project should also include
mechanisms for monitoring, evaluation, and adaptation of results.
A trained, well-compensated workforce is essential for
restoration to meet high ecological standards. Also essential is
the development of markets for low value timber to support the
economics of restoration activities.
Restoration forestry is still a young science. Currently, much of
the work to define its concepts and practices is taking place out
West due to the critical need to deal with massive wildfires.
However, the privately-owned Pioneer
Forest in the Missouri Ozarks demonstrates solid success with
more than a half-century of uneven-aged management in hardwood
forest types similar to those in Virginia. Specifically,
single-tree selection harvests at Pioneer have restored high
quality oak-hickory forests, allowed the sustainable, continuing
harvest of high-grade lumber, and protected significant natural
communities. Applying single-tree selection as part of an
uneven-aged forest management program, say Pioneer
managers, most closely mimics the natural process which
occurs when a single tree or small group of trees in the forest
succumbs to natural mortality. Such small-scale disturbances as
lightning strikes or insect attack are the most common type of
disturbance affecting late-successional forests. It has been the
only forest management technique practiced on Pioneer Forest
since the 1950s.
In addition, Fernow Experimental Forest, a U.S. Forest
Service Timber and Watershed Research facility in Parsons, WV,
Parsons, West Virginia 26287, is conducting research on
uneven-aged management of Appalachian hardwoods. A group from
VAFW toured Fernow in fall of 2008, and VAFW hopes that
techniques developed at Fernow will further the goals of
restoration forestry.